Thursday, January 23, 2014
OLDBOY
Directed by: Chan-wook Park
Released: 2003
This is one I'd been meaning to see for a long time, and goddamn, I'm really glad I finally watched it. A man is imprisoned for no reason for 15 years. At first, he doesn't even want to get out, he just wants to know why he's there. No one will tell him. He's fed, clothed, and has a room that looks more like a rundown hotel than any kind of prison. Doesn't look like the worst way to do time. After 15 years, he's released, still with no knowledge of why he was there in the first place-- which becomes the premise for the movie. Who were his captors? Why didn't they kill him? Why did they take him in the first place? It's a mystery, it's a thriller, it's got action.. there's a lot to take in. It's beautifully shot and acted. There's a lot of "what the fuck" reveals along the way, particularly when he figures out who had him imprisoned. And the ending, while not perfect, was satisfying enough for me. I will not be seeing the American remake. Unless I really feel like punishing myself, which I'm sure will happen at some point. Highly recommended. 8.5/10.
JOHN WATERS: THIS FILTHY WORLD
Directed by: Jeff Garlin
Released: 2006
I fucking love John Waters. He's insane, trashy, fucking bizarre as hell, a bad influence, and he's completely brilliant. This film is him doing stand-up/storytelling for 90 or so minutes, and I would have watched it for another 90. The shit he has to say is funny, interesting and just plain odd. He tells stories about Divine, Mink Stole and the rest of his cohorts from the early days, talks about filming "Pink Flamingos" (of course), "Desperate Living," "Female Trouble," etc.. he pretty much goes all the way up to his last film, "A Dirty Shame." He also discusses some of his favorite films and directors, almost all of whom were totally unknown to me, but it was interesting to see where the king of sleaze gets his influences from. But his comedy, or whatever you want to call it, often comes across as disjointed. Maybe that was a problem with the editing, but he seems to jump from topic to topic without any transition whatsoever. That wasn't enough to make me dislike this, though-- not by a long shot. My favorite topic from his discussion is how, when given the opportunity, he likes to teach kids how to be juvenile delinquents, something that we really don't have anymore. He tells one story of being somewhere where there's a lot of people, and a little girl comes up to him with her little kid purse and shows it off. "That's a very cute purse!" he says to her. She thanks him. He then says "Did you bring it to steal stuff?" She says "NO!" At which point he asks "Well, would you like to steal some stuff with me? No one will even know it's us." Shit like that. He's a funny, funny guy, and this documentary/standup/whatever shows that perfectly. 8/10.
FLOWERS IN THE ATTIC (1987)
Directed by: Jeffrey Bloom
Released: 1987
So this is a favorite film of my girlfriend-- she's been telling me to watch it for years, and when we started seeing commercials for the TV movie remake, I finally decided to see it. And holy shit, what a BRUTAL fucking movie! I mean, it wasn't super violent or anything, it's just the torture these kids went through... it's all very real. If you don't know the story, there's Mom, Dad and four kids, Dad dies, Mom is broke and decides to take the kids to live with their grandparents (they didn't even know they had grandparents). Her parents are insanely wealthy, and "the grandfather," as he's called, is dying. Not expected to live out the month. Mom decides that she's gonna get back in his good graces, get put back into the will, take all his money, and she and the kids will be set for life. Why "getting a job" wasn't an option for this lady is something I don't understand, but I guess there wouldn't be a movie (or book, or remake) if she was a go getter. Long story short, "the grandmother" immediately exiles the kids to one room, where they have access to a bathroom and an attic full of shit. She's crazy biblical, always beating the kids for their sins, shit like that. The kids know they're in a bad situation, and they know that they shouldn't be getting this treatment, but their mom periodically stops by the room and gives them updates, "he's dying, this'll all be over soon, it's for the best, just a few more weeks", blah blah. Her visits grow increasingly infrequent, until they stop altogether. The kids eventually realize that their mother has all but abandoned them, and they have to try and escape on their own. Solid ending with this one. Lots of ... interesting revelations along the way. 6.5/10
INSIDIOUS
Directed by: James Wan
Released: 2010
I'd watched this one when it first came to DVD, but I remembered absolutely nothing about it (although I do remember being drunk when I saw it, so there's that). Having rewatched it with a clear head, I have to say, this is a pretty goddamn good horror film-- and I am very skeptical on new American horror films. It's not a remake, it's not a sequel (although they made one, which I'll get to in the next post) -- it's not a rehashed story that's been told a million times-- although it seems like it will be, at first. Family moves into old house, wife and kids start seeing/hearing weird things, decide house is haunted, so they move to another house. I dunno what kind of world they live in where they can move into one house, live there a couple weeks and decide to just sell it and buy a new one like it's a fucking blu-ray player, but hey, whatever. Anyway, whatever was haunting the first house follows them to the second, and that's where it gets more interesting. I can't remember what was given away in the trailers, if anything, so I won't say much about why things are haunted, just know that there's several malevolent (or "insidious", as it were) forces trying to fuck with this family. They call in some old psychic-type lady and her two bumbling assistants (big "Poltergeist" vibe with that, I quite liked the assistants, they provided just a small amount of comic relief, but not so much as to be campy) and she tries to take care of business. It ends up being more about astral projection and other worlds of existence than anything else, which is why I said it starts out as a pretty typical story, but takes a turn into something that isn't discussed often. And the ending... well, put it this way. When the credits started to roll, I said, out loud, "THAT is how you end a fucking movie." 7.5/10
INSIDIOUS: CHAPTER 2
Directed by: James Wan
Released: 2013
Basically picks up right where the first film left off, with a short prequel scene to open the film. You really, really need to see the first movie to get this one, so don't watch them out of order. This was good, I liked it, and it felt like James Wan actually had a much larger story that he split into two films (this isn't true, unfortunately; the first film was an unexpected success, and the studio wanted a sequel). However, considering that Wan didn't have this big story arc, he did a good job of faking it. It was not as good as the first, often referring to rehashed "scares" from the original, but it did a good job of continuing the story.. the first "Insidious" does end on a pretty big cliffhanger, so I was glad that this one was made-- although now that I think of it, the uncertainty of the ending from the first film would have been a fantastic way to end the story. There's some genuinely creepy visuals, and the score was fantastic, but it felt ... rushed? I don't know. That's the problem with sequels-- unless you have a very clear story in mind (like "Kill Bill" parts 1 and 2, yes, I know they were supposed to be one film), it's hard to continue something without repeating yourself. 6/10.
RED, WHITE & BLUE
Directed by: Simon Rumley
Released: 2010
It's a revenge flick, but... it's not what you'd expect. It's really difficult to review this film without giving away the entire story. In fact, there's a pretty major plot point early on that sets the tone for the rest of the film, and I can't even really divulge what it is. RW&B focuses on the stories and lives of three people, Erica, Nate and Frankie, whose paths all cross at one point or another. Erica is a lowlife drifter girl who bangs pretty much any dude who asks her (and there's a lot of 'em). Frankie is a more lighthearted, even sort of likeable, character. The young, hip guy in the band. And Nate.. Nate is an Iraq war vet, honorably discharged. He's also a complete psychopath who regales people with tales of torturing animals as a child (except his beloved cat, he "treated that cat like it was [his] little baby.") He also may or may not have a job offer from the CIA.
So we've got these three characters... what does all this mean? Again, I can't really say without giving away too much. Plus, it's so much better when you see everything unfold without any preconceived notions. If you like gritty revenge films, watch this. If you like well done arthouse films and don't mind some brutal (but appropriate) violence, watch this. 8/10.
So we've got these three characters... what does all this mean? Again, I can't really say without giving away too much. Plus, it's so much better when you see everything unfold without any preconceived notions. If you like gritty revenge films, watch this. If you like well done arthouse films and don't mind some brutal (but appropriate) violence, watch this. 8/10.
INSIDE DEEP THROAT
Directed by: Fenton Bailey, Randy Barbato
Released: 2005
I watched this immediately after watching "Lovelace", mainly because I'd heard Linda's side, now I wanted to hear what everyone else had to say about the experience. And while this film is mostly about the constant censorship, lawsuits and other hurdles the filmmakers of "Deep Throat" had to face, they do all discuss Linda and her involvement. In a famous quote, Linda says "When you are watching "Deep Throat," you are watching me being raped." The cast and crew of "Deep Throat", when interviewed for this documentary, completely deny that (of course) -- but I also tend to believe them, at least a little. According to, well, everyone, Linda was a compulsive liar from the get-go. She also, apparently, quite enjoyed her time as a porn star, fame aside. But now I'm rambling on with my opinions. "Inside Deep Throat" is a really great documentary, especially if you haven't seen the original film (somehow, I haven't). It was highly amusing to see the original director now; he's a fumbling old man with his pants pulled up to his nipples. Hardly the sadistic scumbag he was painted as in the 70's. The arrest of Harry Reems is discussed at length, which is an interesting story on its own. Recommended for fans of the original film or newcomers like myself. 7/10.
LOVELACE
Directed by: Rob Epstein, Jerry Friedman
Released: 2013
The fictionalized(?) story of Linda Lovelace and her time spent filming "Deep Throat". I put a question mark after "fictionalized" simply because of the controversial and divided views people have concerning Linda and the film. "Lovelace" is based on one of her books (I can't remember which one, whatever the first one was), and tells the supposedly true story of how she was coerced into working in the porn industry. Regardless of what side of the story you believe, this was a very good film, and it did a damn fine job of portraying a sleazy 70's Miami. Peter Sarsgaard's Chuck was extremely convincing and totally scummy, and Amanda Seyfried did an excellent job as Ms. Lovelace. And Hank Azaria as the sleazy porn director? Shit. That was just perfect casting. 8/10
The fictionalized(?) story of Linda Lovelace and her time spent filming "Deep Throat". I put a question mark after "fictionalized" simply because of the controversial and divided views people have concerning Linda and the film. "Lovelace" is based on one of her books (I can't remember which one, whatever the first one was), and tells the supposedly true story of how she was coerced into working in the porn industry. Regardless of what side of the story you believe, this was a very good film, and it did a damn fine job of portraying a sleazy 70's Miami. Peter Sarsgaard's Chuck was extremely convincing and totally scummy, and Amanda Seyfried did an excellent job as Ms. Lovelace. And Hank Azaria as the sleazy porn director? Shit. That was just perfect casting. 8/10
Tuesday, August 6, 2013
ONLY GOD FORGIVES
Directed by: Nicholas Winding Refn
Released: 2013
I knew I had to see this movie for two reasons: 1.) it got so much fucking hate and negative criticism that I knew I'd enjoy it, and 2.) it was directed by Nicholas Refn, and while I didn't think "Drive" was as great as everyone else did, I absolutely fucking loved "Valhalla Rising." "Only God Forgives" seems to have more in common with the latter than the former, employing minimal dialogue, long, slow shots, interesting sound design and a killer score. I didn't know much about the story going into it, but it's pretty simple: Ryan Gosling and his brother are living in Thailand, where Gosling runs an illegal drug ring and fight club deal. His brother ends up sleeping with, and murdering, a 14 or 15 year old prostitute. Obviously, the father of the girl wants revenge, and gets it. Enter Gosling's mother, who travels from the US to identify her son's corpse, not knowing the full story. She gets it, and immediately decides that her eldest son needs to exact revenge on those who killed his brother. She's a brutal, cold hearted cunt, and she's just perfect. She has extremely inappropriate conversations with and about her sons, and she cusses like a goddamn sailor. I thought she was great.
The film was dark yet extremely colorful, it was quiet but loud, it was brutally violent but somehow restricted and not at all exploitative. This has more in common with an art film than anything else. Anyone who's a fan of truly interesting and different film making should see this. Or, if you're looking for a decent crime/drama story, this'll do you just fine. 8/10
THE COLLECTION
Directed by: Marcus Dunstan
Released: 2012
I really enjoyed "The Collector," the precursor to this film. "The Collection," however, while pretty decent, was not as good as the first. There was some really awesome gore and death scenes, much like the first, but something was... different, I guess. The first film was just The Collector in a house with a few people, but in "The Collection," we get to see his abandoned hotel/warehouse space where he keeps and tortures the one person from every group that he keeps alive. A lot of those scenes were quite good; The Collector takes the people that he keeps alive, dopes them up with unfathomable amounts of opiates, chains them to walls and puts them in straight jackets, and lets them essentially work as his "guard dogs" -- they're zombies, basically, although they're not actually dead. All they really know how to do is kill, which is kind of cool. The ending of the film was... I'm not sure how I feel about it. There's another sequel coming, I can almost assure you of that. But there was a twist of sorts, so I won't say exactly why I think there's another film coming.
I think I enjoyed the first one so much because the location was smaller, there wasn't as much at the killers disposal, and he had to improvise. It was more personal. It was more claustrophobic and invoked a sense of dread, whereas "The Collection" just didn't have that. I did like it, but it was nowhere near as good as the first. With that said, it's still a mainstream Hollywood horror film, and it's not a remake, and it's gory as hell, so I have to give it credit for that alone. Plus, as my girlfriend pointed out, how many horror sequels are actually worth a shit? Not many, that I can think of... 5.5/10
SUNSHINE
Directed by: Danny Boyle
Released: 2007
A movie I'd never heard of, but one that came highly recommended to me by almost everyone I know. "Sunshine" is a story that takes place 50 years in the future. The sun is dying out, and if something isn't done about it, every living thing on earth will perish. A team of space...whatevers are sent to essentially plant and detonate a bomb inside the sun (this would create a "new star" inside the sun, which would basically kickstart the sun into working properly again). It's funny that I watched this so shortly after watching "Event Horizon," because they're pretty similar in a lot of ways. People trapped in space, someone/something is trying to kill them all off, there's a different abandoned and thought to be lost ship, etc. The stories and objectives were obviously different, but there were similarities.
I really enjoyed "Sunshine." Again, it's a space movie, and those freak me out enough, but the added element of "someone/something" coming after the crew steps it up a bit. It's not a horror film, though-- more of a sci-fi thriller, I'd say. The acting and direction were fantastic, and the sheer scope of the film was incredible. The way they (digitally, obviously) captured the vastness and sheer terror of open space was pretty great. There's some pretty bleak moments in the film, and once it hits a certain point, you basically know how it's going to end... but it's not quite what you might expect. This one's definitely going to be a purchase. 8/10
SPRING BREAKERS
Directed by: Harmony Korine
Released: 2012
I will never hide the fact that I absolutely love Harmony Korine. "Gummo" is in my top ten movies of all time, and it's a film I could watch every day and never get sick of it. It's so visceral, so disturbing and discomforting, that you notice some new layer of filth every time you watch it. But this isn't about "Gummo."
I didn't absolutely love "Spring Breakers," but I didn't hate it by any stretch. The most important thing, to me, the thing I was most looking forward to, was the direction; I really only watched it because it was a Korine flick (if almost any other director had done this film, there's no way I would have seen it). And the direction was good.. as were the sets and production design, lighting, etc.. All quite good. Effective and appropriate. I don't think there was a moment of silence in the film; there was either dialogue or music at every conceivable moment. So that, coupled with the day-glo/neon/psychedelic lighting and color schemes, made it feel like a 94 minute music video. The girls all acted well, and I know this because I didn't like any of them. I've known people like them (minus the whole robbery/involvement in murder & drugs stuff), and they're just the worst kind of people. BUT, because I hated them, I see that as a sign of good acting on their part. You aren't supposed to feel bad for these chicks, because they're not good people. Well, maybe two of 'em are. You just gotta watch. James Franco as Alien was entertaining, though I found him grating on my nerves after a while.. but again, I think that was the point. There seems to be some kind of anti-consumerist/anti-generation X/anti-entitlement social commentary going on underneath the overall story, but you need to dig a little bit to find it. There were stylistic choices made that seemed like classic Harmony Korine-- odd and confusing editing techniques, extensive use of voice overs, often one on top of another, things like that.. but it seemed like he was trying to be strange and never quite made it.
I bought the Blu-Ray, so I can watch it again, which I likely will soon. I do love Harmony Korine, and as much as I was underwhelmed by his last "Hollywood" film, "Mister Lonely," I did enjoy this. But the reason I was underwhelmed by "Mister Lonely" (and not, say, "Trash Humpers") is the same reason I was mildly underwhelmed by "Spring Breakers" ... I keep thinking (or, more accurately, "desperately hoping") Korine's gonna make "Gummo" again. And he won't. Although Korine still does his extremely odd shorts, and films like "Trash Humpers", he's moved on and grown as a filmmaker, and I need to just accept, and respect, that fact. But goddammit, I wish he'd go back to his roots.... 7/10
EVENT HORIZON
Directed by: Paul W.S Anderson
Released: 1997
Somehow, I missed ever seeing this movie. It's one of those films where everyone I know has seen it, they all love it, and they all give me shit for never having watched it. I've had no aversion to it, I just never got around to it until the other night. I enjoyed it quite a bit. It was creepy enough (it's a movie about being trapped in space with some murderous force, of course it's creepy), had the right elements of suspense, not too many "jump moments", and just the right amount of gore (although I read about everything that had to be cut to get an R rating, I'd kill to see the original cut). For some reason, and I think it was the acting, I got a "CUBE" vibe from it-- it may have also been the parts where they're crawling around inside the walls of the ship that look like they were ripped right from "CUBE". The acting wasn't perfect, but I've seen far worse, especially in sci-fi/horror films. I'd watch it again for sure. 7.5/10
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
BLACK METAL VEINS
Director: Lucifer Valentine
Released: 2012
i've known a few junkies in my time, and i never liked 'em. well, i did, because we were friends first, but then they got hooked on dope and became huge pieces of shit. basically, they're exactly like the people in this film.
"black metal veins" is a documentary about five heroin addicts. basically, the film consists of them shooting up and smoking crack for 90 minutes. the "black metal" part of the title comes from the fact that these kids (adults? 20somethings) are all really into the genre, and a couple of them have a band together. they talk about black metal, how they like the nihilistic message, it's a perfect genre for the destruction of the human race, blah blah. but, beyond that, the movie's really just about them shooting dope. and man, they shoot a fucking lot of it. inhuman amounts. one guy died during the filming (not an OD, he was shot eight times during a drug deal gone bad, four in the heart, four in the head). raven, one of the "main characters", we'll say, OD's pretty hard and i really, really thought she was dead. main reason being because she took a much bigger hit than she normally takes, and she looked really dead. her friend and boyfriend picked her up, stripped her clothes off and threw her on the bed, face down. the camera looks back on her and there's a giant pool of blood forming where her head is. presumably after some time has passed, the director asks one of her friends where she is, and he says "oh, she's dead." but people on the internet say she's not...? whatever.
there's a lot of sex in this film. none of it is stimulating to watch. in fact, all of it is downright fucking sad. brad (third from the left in the photo, holding the needle) is banging his prostitute friend (furthest to the right in the photo) who just lets him fondle her shit whenever he feels like it. they're laying on the couch, he shoots some dope into her stomach, she takes her tits out, starts touching herself, then she passes out. he flips her over, takes her clothes off, and..... we cut to another scene. apparently, it's revealed in the directors commentary that even though it looks like she was about to be raped, she wasn't. i guess.
bottom line: this is not a feel good documentary. shit, this isn't even like an episode of "intervention" where there might be some semblance of hope shining through by the end. this is a harrowing, up close portrait of what heroin does to you. it destroys you. these people, the ones that are left, at least, have no lives to speak of. they're sad, disgusting, quite-literally-rotting humans with absolutely no reason to live. you don't feel bad for them. you can't feel bad for them. i couldn't, at least.
if there was ever a part of me that wanted to try dope (there wasn't), it's fucking gone now. 6/10.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










